Page 38 - IDEA Studie 07 2023 TACR

ARE SUBSIDIES TO BUSINESS R&D EFFECTIVE? REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY EVIDENCE FROM THE TA CR ALFA PROGRAMME
Appendix
Privately funded R&D expenditure (millions CZK) Publicly-funded R&D expenditure (millions CZK) Publicly-funded R&D exp. – national (millions CZK)
Publicly-funded R&D exp. – tax incentives (millions CZK) Current R&D expenditure (millions CZK)
Capital R&D expenditure (millions CZK)
Employment (FTE)
Sales (millions CZK)
Labour productivity (thousand CZK)
Foreign-owned (1/0)
Stockholding (1/0)
Manufacturing (1/0)
Prague (1/0)
Number of project participants
Co-operation with a research organisation (1/0)
Table A1: Varia
Intramural R&D expen non-profit sector and h
Intramural R&D expen
Intramural R&D expen of direct R&D support) n
m Intramural R&D expen
Current intramural R&
Capital intramural R&D v
Number of employees i Sales of products and s Value added per emplo
Dummy variable with v Dummy variable with v Dummy variable with v Dummy variable with v Number of project part Dummy variable with v
R&D expenditure (millions CZK) Total intramural R&D
Publicly-funded R&D exp. – international (millions CZK)
Intramural R&D expe and framework progra
Patent (1/0)
Dummy variable with of the Czech Republic
Time since incorporation Number of years since
Note: R&D data is based on the harmonized methodology of Frascati manual (OECD 20 of this study, because similarly to private entities, higher education institutions make b programmes.
Source: Based on micro data from CZSO (2021) and TACR (2017).
36