Page 32 - IDEA Study 10 2015 Skills Mismatches

Table 6.Share of horizontally mismatched graduates by field of education Field of study Secondary educated: Share of horizontal mismatch Tertiary educated: Share of horizontal mismatch Field of study Medicine Pedagogy Engineering and metallurgy Wholesale and retail Secretarial and office work Architecture and construction Services for households and individuals Electrotechnics and energetics Banking, insurance, accountancy Hospitality management, restaurant services Wood, plastic and glass manufacturing Transportation Technology and engineering of motor vehicles Food production Economics Art Agriculture, forestry and fishing Electronics and automatization Textiles production 28.6% 35.9% 46.6% 52.1% 56.3% 58.2% 58.2% 61.1% 62.6% 63.2% 66.4% 67.9% 68.6% 71.4% 72.8% 73.7% 79.6% 81.9% 82.6% Medicine Information technology Pharmacy Law Architecture and construction Banking, insurance, accountancy Pedagogy Security services and military Engineering and metallurgy Art Social care Economics Transportation Agriculture, forestry and fishing Marketing Biology, physics, geology, and life science Electrotechnics and energetics Electronics and automatization Languages Chemistry Tourism Library studies Math and statistics Philosophy 6.5% 23.5% 23.6% 28.3% 29.0% 30.0% 32.0% 39.7% 47.2% 48.1% 50.5% 50.9% 53.0% 64.4% 64.6% 68.2% 73.2% 75.5% 77.1% 77.8% 78.8% 95.3% 95.3% 100.0% Note: The table reports the share of horizontally mismatched individuals by field of education. Fields of study, which account for less than 1% of secondary and tertiary educated individuals, are not reported here. Sample includes all individuals aged 18-28 for secondary educated and aged 25-35 for tertiary educated who are in formal employment. Source: Czech Labor Force Survey data (2011-2014), own calculation. 28