Page 24 - IDEA Studie 09 2020 Nechtene plody prorodinnych politik

NECHTĚNÉ PLODY PRORODINNÝCH POLITIK IDEA 2020 6. Reference Bičáková, A. (2016) „Gender unemployment gaps in the EU: blame the family“, IZA J. Eur. Labor Stud. 5(1), 22. Bičáková, A., Kalíšková, K. (2015). „Od mateřství k nezaměstnanosti: Postavení žen s malými dětmi na trhu práce“, IDEA studie 8/2015. https://idea.cerge-ei.cz/studies/2015-10-od- materstvi-k-nezamestnanosti-postaveni-zen-s-malymi-detmi-na-trhu-prace Bičáková, A., Kalíšková, K. (2019) „(Un)intended effects of parental leave policies: Evidence from the Czech Republic“, Labour Economics 61, 101747 Das, T., Polachek, S. (2015) „Unanticipated effects of California´s paid family leave program“, Contemporary Economic Policy 33(4), 619-635. Klerman, J., Leibowitz, A., 1999. „Job continuity among new mothers“, Demography 36(2), 145- 155. Lalive, R., Schlosser, A., Steinhauer, A., Zweimüller, J. (2014) „Parental leave and mothers´ careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits“, R. Econ. Stud. 81(1), 219- 265. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt028. Lalive, R., Zweimülleer, J. (2009) „How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments“, R. Econ. Stud. 81(1), 219-265. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt028. Münich, D., Kalíšková, K. (2012) „Češky: nevyužitý potenciál země“, Idea CERGE-EI, krátká studie 3/2012. Olivetti, C., Petrongolo, B. (2017) „The economic consequences of family policies: lessons from a century of legislation in high-income countries“, J.Econ.Perspect. 31 (1), 205-230. Doi:10.3386/w23051 Pertold-Gebicka, B. (2019). Parental leave length and mothers’ careers: What can be inferred from occupational allocation? Applied Economics. Rossin-Slater, M. (2018) „Maternity and family leave policy. In: Susan L.Averett, Laura M. Argys, S.D.H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy. Oxford University Press, 323-342. 22