Page 24 - IDEA Studie 3 2017 Zeny a muzi v ceskem vyzkumu
P. 24
Reference
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517-539.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811-822.
Andres, J. T.H. (2011). Overcoming gender barriers in science: Facts and figures. Science and Development Network, June 22. Available at http://www.scidev.net/global/educat ion/feature/overcoming-gender-barriers-in-science-facts-and-figures-1.html.
Bagues, M., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter? American Economic Review, forthcoming.
Český statistický úřad (2017). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje za rok 2015: Věda, výzkum a inovace, Praha, Kód publikace: 211002 – 16. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ukazatele-vyzkumu-a-vyvoje-2015
Elsevier. Gender in the Global Reserach Landscape
https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/265661/ElsevierGenderReport_final_for- web.pdf
European Comission (2016). European Research Area Progress Report 2016: Technical Report. doi: 10.2777/35265 http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/era_progress _report2016/era_progress_report_2016_technical_report.pdf
Eurostat (2015). Research and Development Statistics.
https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-leaflet-web.pdf
Freeman, R. B., & Huang, W. (2015). Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1), S289-S318.
Jurajda Š., Kozubek S., Münich, D. & Škoda S. (2015). Oborová publikační výkonnost pracovišť výzkumných organizací v ČR v letech 2009-2013. Studie IDEA 5/2015, Praha.
Kelchtermans, S., & Veugelers, R. (2013). Top research productivity and its persistence: Gender as a double-edged sword. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 273-285.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication, 35(5), 603-625.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479.
MŠMT (2016). Výkonové ukazatele. http://dsia.uiv.cz/vystupy/vu_vs_f4.html
Srholec, M., & Szkuta, K. (2016). RIO Country Report 2015: Czech Republic (No. JRC101175). Institute
for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre.
Tenglerová, H. (2015). Postavení žen v české vědě, Monitorovací zpráva za rok 2014. Národní
Boschini, A., & Sjögren, A. (2007). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship
patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 325-365.
McDowell, J. M., & Smith, J. K. (1992). The effect of gender‐sorting on propensity to coauthor:
Implications for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30(1), 68-82.
kontaktní centrum–gender a věda. Sociologický ústav AV
http://www.soc.cas.cz/publikace/postaveni-zen-v-ceske-vede-monitorovaci-zprava-za-rok-2014
ČR.
Zeng, X. H., Duch, J., Sales-Pardo, M., Moreira, J. A., Radicchi, F., Ribeiro, H. V., ... & Amaral, L. A. (2016). Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender. PLOS
Biology, 14(11).
22
