Page 36 - IDEA Studie 20 2016 Preference klimatickych politik

Literatura
Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018
Bechtel, M. M., & Scheve, K. F. (2013). Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(34), 13763– 13768. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306374110
Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., & Weimer, D. L. (2004). Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00094-9
Blyth, B. (2008). Mixed mode: the only ‘fitness’ regime? International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 241–266.
Bukowski, M., Másnicki, J., Śniegocki, A., & Trzeciakowski, R. (2015). Polski węgiel: quo vadis? Perspektywy rozwoju górnictwa węgla kamiennego w Polsce. WISE Institute.
Cools, M., Brijs, K., Tormans, H., Moons, E., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2011). The socio- cognitive links between road pricing acceptability and changes in travel-behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(8), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.006
Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026
Dreyer, S. J., Teisl, M. F., & McCoy, S. K. (2015). Are acceptance, support, and the factors that affect them, different? Examining perceptions of U.S. fuel economy standards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 39, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.06.002
Dreyer, S. J., & Walker, I. (2013). Acceptance and Support of the Australian Carbon Policy. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.003
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006
Ferrini, S., & Scarpa, R. (2007). Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007
Chaudoin, S., Smith, D. T., & Urpelainen, J. (2014). American evangelicals and domestic versus international climate policy. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-013-9178-9
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users’ acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967- 070X(00)00005-6
Joint Statement of the 21st Meeting of the Ministers of Environment of the Visegrad Group Countries, the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania. (2014, September 30).
Kallbekken, S., & Aasen, M. (2010). The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2183–2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.003
34